Hi! First off, I realize that while vim is involved in my problem, it may not be the culprit. Still, this mailing list is one of the most civilized and helpful I know (can't say that for all of the fora for the other involved software), so I'll start here.
Here's my problem. I like >8-color schemes. Unfortunately, my terminal of choice (urxvt) only supports 88 colors (t_Co=88). Thus, most colorschemes revert to their 8-color behaviour or simply do nothing, neither of which is what I want. The most excellent colorscheme "desert256" is both to my liking and works well in plain urxvt. It's when screen is involved that things go south. Screen tells vim that t_Co is 8 which is not only wrong, but also ugly. If I tell vim by hand that t_Co is 88, things become trippy but not beautiful. With t_Co=256 it looks almost like the default case without screen (close enough for me, anyway). I have prepared several screenshots to illustrate what happens: http://eric.schwarzvogel.de/~klausman/screen_and_vim/ The names should be self-explanatory. What I'd like to have is the look of urxvt_vim_t_Co_88.png in the default case of screen (i.e. instead of urxvt_screen_vim_t_Co_8.png) So what I wonder about is this: - Whose fault is this? - How do I fix it? Regards & TIA, Tobias -- panic("%s: CORRUPTED BTREE OR SOMETHING", __FUNCTION__); linux-2.6.6/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
