>> Regarding the page itself: it's good content, but could it be >> more clearly formatted, e.g. making the paragraphs a bulleted >> list or something? > > I tried a bulleted list and it was pretty ugly. I only have rudimentary html > knowledge and have no idea whether it can be fixed in a Google page. Maybe I > should > enable members to edit the page for 24 hours in the hope that someone here > would > tweak it?
I'm happy to have a go if you like. As long as it's in the next 24 hours or so, as I'll be away for a while after that. :-) >> One suggestion for content improvement: subjects should be >> short, but specific. In fact, I would personally say both the >> examples of subjects are pretty poor. They are very broad. >> "Searching in files" begs the question "for what?" IMHO, >> something longer but more specific is heaps >> better: E.g. Find everywhere a word occurs in many files. > > OK. However, we're conversing in a thread called "Hello, how to do?" > and I was just hoping to improve on that. Yeah, fair call. > It might need a fair bit of writing skill to do better than my > proposed examples, and I was wanting to suggest a minimum standard, > while pointing out that terms like "question on" and "how do I" are > probably not needed in a Subject. Would more precision really be > worthwhile in a mailing list? I think it helps, particularly when searching the archives. Ben. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
