Hello, As written in netrw help, wide listing format is the most compact format for listing files.
However, we see easily that this format is far less compact than the one used by the ls unix command. This feature is not comfortable since we remember the position of files by their position in the columns of the ls command. Columns look completly different with unix ls and netrw wide format (for the same terminal width of course). It appears that the rule chosen by ls is the following: variable column width with exactly two spaces between colums. The rule chosen by netrw seems to be: fixed colum width calculated to be the longest file name + 3. Is it (or would it be) possible to have the same rule (the ls one) in both environments. Best regards Jean Johner -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
