On 2010-03-09, Jean Johner wrote: > Hello, > > As written in netrw help, wide listing format is the most compact > format for listing files. > > However, we see easily that this format is far less compact than the > one used by the ls unix command. > > This feature is not comfortable since we remember the position of > files by their position in the columns of the ls command. Columns look > completly different with unix ls and netrw wide format (for the same > terminal width of course). > > It appears that the rule chosen by ls is the following: > variable column width with exactly two spaces between colums. > The rule chosen by netrw seems to be: > fixed colum width calculated to be the longest file name + 3. > > Is it (or would it be) possible to have the same rule (the ls one) in > both environments.
For what it's worth, the output format of the ls command varies among different Unix systems, so there is no one rule for ls. Regards, Gary -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
