do not swim upstream, spit into the wind, or attempt to create a
colorscheme named 'default'
Curious... What is the wisdom?
There's already a colorscheme named 'default', so naming another
colorscheme 'default' didn't work as expected, and isn't worth the
hassle. Just call it something meaningful.
I wouldn't have tried it if there weren't already a default.vim in the
standard distribution. I looked at the contents of the file and it was
mostly empty, but the name sounded so authoritative. I wonder about its
role.
The reason why I looked at it was - I'm the only vim user - and the
default colors are rather difficult to read in vimdiff even with syn off.
Yes, I wouldn't replace it in a multi-user environment...
I used to upgrade once per version so the "overwrite by upgrade" was not a
concern for me.
But thanks all - now I know where to look.
Ben Kim
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
