On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Bram Moolenaar wrote: >> I'll make it so that synstack() works when on the character just after >> the end of the line. It was already working for an empty line, thus >> should also work when just after the last character. > > Would it make sense to have it work on any character past the end of the > line? I don't use 'virtualedit', but it seems like it'd make sense to > treat the situation similarly.
I agree that that would be better. At the very least, it definitely should be returning a list, though - even if you don't want to make all characters after EOL give back the same list, they should at least give back an empty list. ~Matt -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
