Elmar Hinz <t3el...@googlemail.com> writes: > Summarising this, you think vim is behaving differently than most > other vi derivates? > > Why is the comment quoted by Christian Brabandt telling, vim tries to > behave like vi?
"vi derivates" is a bit misleading term. All of the programs I discussed, except heirloom vi, are actually vi *clones*. Looking at the original vi itself (heirloom is a version for modern systems) on a 4.3BSD virtual machine I had set up, it does show the same behavior as vim and heirloom vi here. I assume the same behavior is also present on other (mainly commercial) unix systems that have their own implementation of vi derived from 4BSD vi. Does anyone happen to have e.g. an OpenSolaris machine to test on? -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_use" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_use+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
