On 17.11.25 19:13, Tim Chase wrote:
> On 2025-11-18 00:32, Vim Users wrote:
> > On 17.11.25 17:30, Tim Chase wrote:
> > >???? :2,$sort?? " sort by the first column
> > >???? :2,$sor /[^^I]*^I/???? " sort by the second column
> > >???? :2,$sor /\([^^I]*^I\)\{2}/ " sort by third column
> > >???? :2,$sor /\([^^I]*^I\)\{3}/ " sort by the fourth column
> > >???? :2,$sor n /\([^^I]*^I\)\{4}/ " sort numerically by the fifth column
> >
> > !}sort -k 1
>
> Even better! At least as long as you're on a Unix-like system where
> sort(1) is competent (its availability on Windows is a bit less useful)
>
Hi Tim,
That's what I suspected, but having not used the MS OS or their other products
in 30 years in IT, or privately this last half century, I didn't feel competent
to comment there. My suggestions are, though, hopefully unixversal. ;-)
Erik
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_use" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_use/0892b57c-49dc-4b06-a65e-03d56d950373%40localhost.
