I agree that Apple is the first company to have such wide spread accessibility across their product line, but I still don't agree that they were the first company to care about accessibility, which is what Fred stated.

I'm sure we'll disagree on what's meant by lip service and caring, but through out the 80's and 90's, IBM had multiple teams working on products like PC Said, Screen Reader, Screen Reader/2 and Home Page Reader when to my knowledge Apple had no one dedicated to accessibility, at least not that I can tell from the Apple products at the time and their lack of representation at consumer gatherings of the blind. This doesn't even include IBM's other products, their contribution to open source projects with respect to accessibility and their work on standards related to accessibility. Like I said, I'm sure you'll call this lip service, but I think this is more than lip service.

There's the further issue that comparing IBM and it's product line to Apple and it's product line is like comparing Apple's and oranges. I'm not even sure what it means for IBM to have accessibility across it's product line since most of the OS's that run on IBM's hardware aren't developed or controlled by IBM. I haven't used all IBM developed applications by any stretch, but I can't think of any applications I've used from IBM, Lotus, Tivoli or Rational that weren't accessible.

IMHO, we can talk up Apple and their commitment to accessibility, since it's story is so good, without having to mis characterize the facts or history or run down other companies or products.




On 06/11/2013 05:51 PM, David Chittenden wrote:
I agree that Microsoft and IBM have both paid lip service to accessibility, IBM 
more than MS, but Apple is the first to provide comprehensive accessibility 
throughout their product line.

David Chittenden, MSc, MRCAA
Email: dchitten...@gmail.com
Mobile: +64 21 2288 288
Sent from my iPhone

On 12/06/2013, at 10:10, Christopher Chaltain <chalt...@gmail.com> wrote:

I didn't think there was any bad energy, pessimism or worry in Shane's message 
or email either. I think people watching their first WWDC keynote should be 
able to ask innocent and sincere questions on this list. My only frustration 
with Shane's message, which I solved with the delete key, is that this has 
already been discussed on this list. There's going to be a lot of discussion on 
this list about IOS 7 and the WWDC, so if people are interested, I'd suggest 
they pay attention to these discussions on this list and maybe even look 
through the archives before asking a question that they think might have 
already come up. Note I wouldn't have said anything about this at all, if I 
wasn't already responding to Fred's message.

Also, in my opinion, Apple wasn't the first computer company to care about 
accessibility. Microsoft and IBM were investing resources on accessibility back 
when Outspoken was the only screen access option for Apple products and in 
those intervening years between Outspoken and VoiceOver where Apple had no 
accessibility for their products. I agree Apple has a better accessibility 
story right now than any other computer company, but this hasn't always been 
the case.

On 06/11/2013 03:08 PM, Ricardo Walker wrote:
Wow!

a bit sensitive no?  I didn't get a ounce of negativity from his post. Note: he 
said its his first time watching WWDC so, he's probably not aware that Apple 
seldom speaks about accessibility during their keynotes.  And he asked for 
others thoughts. He offered no opinion of his own except, he thought IOS 7 
sounded interesting.  I wouldn't really put that down in the negative category. 
lol.    I don't see how having no opinion, and asking for that of others is 
negative?  Or, did I miss something in his post?

Just saying.

Ricardo Walker
rica...@appletothecore.info
Twitter:@apple2thecore
www.appletothecore.info

On Jun 11, 2013, at 3:14 PM, Fred Olver <goodfo...@charter.net> wrote:

Shane, why concentrate bad energy on something which 1 we do not have any 
control over and 2 we don't know what the future holds with regard to 
accessibility.

Is there some reason we should spend all this time until fall worrying about 
this? Have you a crystal ball and have seen in to the future? Apple was the 
first, or nearly the first computer-based company to care about those of us 
with disabilities, is there some reason you think they might change their mind 
about this.

Sounds to me like it would make more sense to look forward optimistically 
rather than look forward pessimistically, takes less energy and it is truly 
alot more fun.

Fred Olver
----- Original Message ----- From: "Shane clark" <hshanecl...@gmail.com>
To: <blindapp...@yahoogroups.com>; <viphone@googlegroups.com>; 
<accessible-...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 2:02 PM
Subject: Apple Keynote


Hi guys,
Well yall, what'd you think of the presentation? I've Never saw one live, but 
I've been watching it on my Apple TV. What I've heard, it sounds like iOS 7 
will be pretty interesting, but I didn't hear anything mentioned about 
accessibility... Your thoughts?
Shane.

Sent from my iPhone

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone" Google 
Group.
To search the VIPhone public archive, visit 
http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.
To post to this group, send email to viphone@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en.
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"VIPhone" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2904 / Virus Database: 3199/6401 - Release Date: 06/11/13

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone" Google 
Group.
To search the VIPhone public archive, visit 
http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.
To post to this group, send email to viphone@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en.
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"VIPhone" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




--
Christopher (CJ)
chaltain at Gmail

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone" Google 
Group.
To search the VIPhone public archive, visit 
http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.
To post to this group, send email to viphone@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en.
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"VIPhone" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




--
Christopher (CJ)
chaltain at Gmail

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone" Google 
Group.
To search the VIPhone public archive, visit 
http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.
To post to this group, send email to viphone@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en.
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "VIPhone" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to