From: Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 06:54:24 +0200
> We also can avoid the sock_put()/sock_hold() pair for each tx packet, > to only touch sk_wmem_alloc (with appropriate atomic_sub_return() in > sock_wfree() > and atomic_dec_test in sk_free > > We could initialize sk->sk_wmem_alloc to one instead of 0, so that > sock_wfree() could just synchronize itself with sk_free() Excellent idea Eric. > Patch will follow after some testing I look forward to it :-) _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
