From: Barry Song <v-songbao...@oppo.com> Non-blocking allocation with __GFP_NOFAIL is not supported and may still result in NULL pointers (if we don't return NULL, we result in busy-loop within non-sleepable contexts):
static inline struct page * __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, struct alloc_context *ac) { ... /* * Make sure that __GFP_NOFAIL request doesn't leak out and make sure * we always retry */ if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL) { /* * All existing users of the __GFP_NOFAIL are blockable, so warn * of any new users that actually require GFP_NOWAIT */ if (WARN_ON_ONCE_GFP(!can_direct_reclaim, gfp_mask)) goto fail; ... } ... fail: warn_alloc(gfp_mask, ac->nodemask, "page allocation failure: order:%u", order); got_pg: return page; } Highlight this in the documentation of __GFP_NOFAIL so that non-mm subsystems can reject any illegal usage of __GFP_NOFAIL with GFP_ATOMIC, GFP_NOWAIT, etc. Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbao...@oppo.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vba...@suse.cz> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <d...@stgolabs.net> Cc: Christoph Lameter <c...@linux.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rient...@google.com> Cc: "Eugenio PĂ©rez" <epere...@redhat.com> Cc: Hailong.Liu <hailong....@oppo.com> Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hye...@gmail.com> Cc: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com> Cc: Kees Cook <k...@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoa...@oracle.com> Cc: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penb...@kernel.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushc...@linux.dev> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <ure...@gmail.com> Cc: Xuan Zhuo <xuanz...@linux.alibaba.com> --- include/linux/gfp_types.h | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux/gfp_types.h b/include/linux/gfp_types.h index 313be4ad79fd..4a1fa7706b0c 100644 --- a/include/linux/gfp_types.h +++ b/include/linux/gfp_types.h @@ -215,7 +215,8 @@ enum { * the caller still has to check for failures) while costly requests try to be * not disruptive and back off even without invoking the OOM killer. * The following three modifiers might be used to override some of these - * implicit rules. + * implicit rules. Please note that all of them must be used along with + * %__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM flag. * * %__GFP_NORETRY: The VM implementation will try only very lightweight * memory direct reclaim to get some memory under memory pressure (thus @@ -246,6 +247,8 @@ enum { * cannot handle allocation failures. The allocation could block * indefinitely but will never return with failure. Testing for * failure is pointless. + * It _must_ be blockable and used together with __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM. + * It should _never_ be used in non-sleepable contexts. * New users should be evaluated carefully (and the flag should be * used only when there is no reasonable failure policy) but it is * definitely preferable to use the flag rather than opencode endless -- 2.39.3 (Apple Git-146)