Christian,
> Problems are different (we don’t care if the WG sessions are boring, > decisions on consensus are difficult, is it appropriate to have the main > discussions, presentations and Q&A on the remote hub vs the real meeting?, > etc) To elaborate a bit on your point: 1. So far remote hubs have been mostly outside the U.S. Now, I think we should have quite a few inside the U.S. This will help the people who are currently here and may not be able to get a visa to come back, if they leave. It will also help people who cannot travel 3 times per year outside the U.S. 2. So, then could it happen that the U.S. remote hub ends up with MORE people than the IETF main meeting? Nalini _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html. https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet
