On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 12:30:19PM -0700, Peter Prymmer wrote: > > > > In order to build the miniperl from the 6919 kit I had to use a > > configure.com patched with the patch I sent in yesterday: > > > > http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/vmsperl/2000-08/msg00149.html > > Thanks, applied. Ooops. That was my fault. I had intentionally refrained from sending it in hoping that I could get a little VMS platform testing in first. I guess we are too close to the deadline now :-) I will test on a few different compilers/architectures though. Peter Prymmer
- not OK, 6919 on Alpha VMS V 7.1 w/ DECC 6.0-001 Peter Prymmer
- Re: not OK, 6919 on Alpha VMS V 7.1 w/ DECC 6.0-001 Peter Prymmer
- Re: not OK, 6919 on Alpha VMS V 7.1 w/ DECC 6.0-001 Jarkko Hietaniemi
- FW: not OK, 6919 on Alpha VMS V 7.1 w/ DECC 6.0... Peter Prymmer
- FW: not OK, 6919 on Alpha VMS V 7.1 w/ DECC 6.0-001 Jordan Henderson
- Re: not OK, 6919 on Alpha VMS V 7.1 w/ DECC 6.0-001 Craig A. Berry
- Re: not OK, 6919 on Alpha VMS V 7.1 w/ DECC 6.0... Craig A. Berry
- Re: FW: not OK, 6919 on Alpha VMS V 7.1 w/ DECC 6.0... John Peacock
- Re: FW: not OK, 6919 on Alpha VMS V 7.1 w/ DECC... Peter Prymmer
- Re: not OK, 6919 on Alpha VMS V 7.1 w/ DECC 6.0-001 Peter Prymmer
- Re: not OK, 6919 on Alpha VMS V 7.1 w/ DECC 6.0... Craig A. Berry
