Yes, of course, we're happy to allocate security types to those that need them as we do with encoding types.
Cheers Tristan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Ammann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:26 AM Subject: Re: VNC 4.0b3 and RFB > On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 18:01, Tristan Richardson wrote: > > VNC 4.0b3 uses version 3.7 of the protocol, but is completely backwards > > compatible with version 3.3. I've put the latest protocol document on the > > website, accessible from the documentation page > > http://www.realvnc.com/documentation.html > > Are you willing to serve as the "registration authority" for new > security types? This would allow other developers to create versions > with specific security requirements, while staying compatible with RFB > 3.7. > > CU, Joe > _______________________________________________ > VNC-List mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To remove yourself from the list visit: > http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
