My my... Perhaps...just what the RealVNC list needed. All the previous posts on port forwarding, ssh....converged into a simple interface.
Whilst I would assume the majority of users are not technically inclined and putty is a great front end, the difficulties of implementing the open source SSH servers for the average Window users is noted. Unless, of course the average user is willing to pay for a commercial solution. ...but the plethora of no-cost RealVNC users tend to exist for a reason! The bigger questions generated are definitely worthwhile discussing, i.e. network admin's economic and security priorities with their overworked IT staff perpetually several "internet" generations behind vs the ever increasing computational power, security sophistication and internet savvy "mobile" independent users (consumers). The idea of virtual network adapters, secure and simple network pools, etc... is very powerful stuff, indeed. Thanks, Alex for stepping up to the plate. What is your take on SHA1 being recently broken by Chinese researchers? NK -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Pankratov Sent: March 1, 2005 11:25 PM To: Paul Haskew Cc: vnc-list@realvnc.com Subject: Re: A simple, solid and stable P2P Bidirectional NAT Traversal technique for RealVNC users... Paul Haskew wrote: > While I am glad to see the main designer/developer here, I do not wear tin > foil hats. :P I am just a concerned IT Admin, who will at one point will > have to make a decision about this program. TCP/11975 ;-) _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list VNC-List@realvnc.com To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
