On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 09:44:40AM -0700, Dave Warren wrote: > I might have misunderstood, I don't use SSH very much, but from an > encryption-only standpoint (Using VNC's own authentication, which would go > through the SSH tunnel too, so we don't have to worry about the security > problems recently posted), SSH should be simple and easy to implement, > right? Ah, good point. Yes, you are right. Tim. */ [demime 0.97b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list to [EMAIL PROTECTED] See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------
- Stream encryption - is it time? Bryan A. Pendleton
- Re: Stream encryption - is it time? Jonathan Morton
- Re: Stream encryption - is it time? Joseph A. Knapka
- Re: Stream encryption - is it time? tbx
- Re: Stream encryption - is it time? Tim Waugh
- Re: Stream encryption - is it time? tbx
- Re: Stream encryption - is it time? Jonathan Morton
- Re: Stream encryption - is it time? Dave Warren
- Re: Stream encryption - is it tim... Tim Waugh
- Re: Stream encryption - is it tim... Jonathan Morton
- Re: Stream encryption - is it... Bryan Pendleton
- Re: Stream encryption - is it... Joseph A. Knapka
- Re: Stream encryption - i... Jonathan Morton
- Re: Stream encryption - i... Joseph A. Knapka
- Re: Stream encryption - i... Jonathan Morton
- Re: Stream encryption - i... Joseph A. Knapka
- Re: Stream encryption - is it time? Jonathan Morton
- Re: Stream encryption - is it time? Some Guy
- Re: Stream encryption - is it time? Todd A. Jacobs
