> I just tried WinVNC on a 500 MHz Windows 98 machine, and it works fine
> with the default settings (and much faster)!
>
> So why does it fail on my 200 MHz Windows 95 machine? Is it because
> the machine is too slow, or WinVNC doesn't work so well with Windows
> 95? Is there anything I can do to diagnose the problem?
Win98 = 95 + IE and a few service packs. :-)
I would have said it would be your processor more than anything.
At work, we only have NT workstation and the older Pentium
machines do chug a bit with VNC.
One thing though, I've found that while using "8 bit colour" on the
viewer makes the quick machines work okay over a router, running
8bit on an older machine makes things much worse.
If I were you, I'd play about with the different compression types
with VNC / Tridia and try a few tests with and without 8 bit colour.
Later
Rich
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://www.darkage.co.uk/
"When you wake up one day and find you won't go back to sleep."
~ "Nothing to hold me", Jesus Jones.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
