But does Broadcloud include hosted Broadworks hosted by Broadsoft? It was my understanding that Broadcloud is just the UC-One and texing element hosted by Broadsoft, but not Broadworks.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Alex Hardie <ahar...@bellsouth.net> wrote: > The BroadCloud service is available for carriers as well - given most of > the time they can't get out of their own way it is a way to help them move > quicker. > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Aug 1, 2014, at 6:30 AM, Pete E <peeip...@gmail.com> wrote: > > They do. It seemed like a conflict of interests, given that it makes them > a competitor to their own customers, but so far we've not had an issue with > it. There are plenty of other white labels out there too. > > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Colton Conor <colton.co...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Peter, >> >> Are you saying that Broadsoft now offers hosted white labeled to service >> providers without the requirements of hardware or purchase? >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Peter Rad. <pe...@4isps.com> wrote: >> >>> On 7/31/2014 8:57 PM, Colton Conor wrote: >>> >>>> Max, >>>> >>>> No, we don't have our own Broadsoft platform we have a white label >>>> solution from a wholesaler. With that being said the wholesaler hasn't >>>> implemented UC-One, SMS through MessageNow, Mobilelink with Callthrough, or >>>> Sprint WMI integration. So they only sticky Broadsoft features that our >>>> clients use and would notice are gone if we moved away from Broadsoft are >>>> really the toolbar and Broadworks Anywhere. Everything else I think all the >>>> other platforms do. >>>> >>>> We have looked at buying our own Broadsoft, but it just cost too much >>>> and is too complex. It amazes me how you can spend so much on a Broadsoft >>>> server, and then you must get an Acme Packet, external pop3 server, and and >>>> a whole slew of other software and hardware not from Broadsoft just to have >>>> a complete Broadsoft solution. A hosted, service provider oriented white >>>> label solution works well for our business plan. >>>> >>>> Does any of the other carriers besides Sprint have a solution similar >>>> to WMI? The WMI solution is neat, but Sprint is dead last in carrier >>>> rankings. >>>> >>>> >>> Sprint is the only one that integrates with a softswitch to turn mobile >>> handsets into extensions. >>> >>> Everyone thinks that it is easy to spin up a softswitch and start >>> offering Hosted UC. There are so freaking many components that have to be >>> stitched together. >>> >>> You can stitch together a BSFT replacement but the question will be: >>> does it scale and is it stable? That question all depends on quantity, >>> volume, usage, etc. >>> >>> That said, you should survey your current customer base to see what they >>> need. It might not be unified messaging (chat, SMS, etc. in one interface). >>> It might be software integration. It might be that most of your customers >>> just want key system emulation. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Peter Radizeski @ RAD-INFO INC >>> Circuits * Bandwidth * Consulting >>> (813) 963-5884 >>> >>> Have you read my blog about telecom? http://blog.tmcnet.com/on- >>> rads-radar/ >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> VoiceOps mailing list >>> VoiceOps@voiceops.org >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> VoiceOps mailing list >> VoiceOps@voiceops.org >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops >> >> > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > VoiceOps@voiceops.org > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > >
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps@voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops