Transnexus also has a CA they sell separately. https://transnexus.com/sti-ca/ <https://transnexus.com/sti-ca/>
> On Jun 4, 2022, at 2:05 PM, Mary Lou Carey <mary...@backuptelecom.com> wrote: > > As far as I know, NEUSTAR is the only CA that will allow you to get a token > without using their STIR/SHAKEN services.I know that there are multiple > options for the STIR/SHAKEN products so make sure to ask about the various > products / price ranges. > > MARY LOU CAREY > BackUP Telecom Consulting > Office: 615-791-9969 > Cell: 615-796-1111 > > On 2022-06-03 10:22 PM, Nathan Anderson wrote: >> Starting to collect quotes for SHAKEN cert signing from STI-CAs, and >> got our first response back. >> I also got whiplash at the same time. >> Although I didn't have to sign an NDA or agree to any kind of >> confidentiality in order to get this response, since nobody seemingly >> wants to publish their pricing, I will (at least for the time being) >> keep both the quote itself as well as the vendor name close to my >> chest. But...dang. >> Though I'm hoping to be surprised, I'm guessing that there isn't a >> wide difference in pricing between various STI-CAs. Can people here >> confirm that I'm likely to mostly hear same-y figures from others? Or >> if there are options that are significantly cheaper than others, who >> do y'all recommend that I should be talking to? >> Note that I'm only talking about the CA component as a standalone >> offering, though I'll observe that with very few exceptions, it also >> doesn't seem like too many vendors are either willing to unbundle the >> CA service from their overall "end-to-end cloud-based SHAKEN" >> products, or if they are, they seemingly don't like to publicize it. >> To put my response to this pricing in context, we are a relatively >> small regional broadband provider, and voice is a fraction of a >> fraction of our business. I'd wager just about everyone else here has >> a larger voice subscriber base than we do, and most of you probably >> didn't blink when you saw the price-tag on what it would take to >> become part of the STIR/SHAKEN ecosystem...just the cost of doing >> business, right? >> We do have effective CLID anti-spoof already & have since the >> beginning, and as a small provider, we also were *supposed* to have >> another 12 months to get up to speed on all of this and start signing >> calls...at least, that was the case until the FCC moved that timetable >> up in what I can only describe as a Darth Vader-esque "altering [of] >> the deal". We didn't get that memo in December but only about 3ish >> months ago, and it's not like I don't have plenty of other things to >> do, so I'm already coming into this project plenty pissed off... >> *sigh* Anyway, I can see that the gate-keepery-ness of this industry >> is still alive and well. Though I can understand wanting to keep out >> the riff-raff, you would think that all of the hurdles that one needs >> to clear in order to get this far -- getting an OCN, on-boarding with >> the STI-PA, etc. -- would be enough without also throwing yet another >> huge mandatory & ongoing expense on top of the pile as well. >> Sorry. Didn't mean for this to turn into a rant, but...ugh. >> -- >> Nathan Anderson >> First Step Internet, LLC >> nath...@fsr.com >> _______________________________________________ >> VoiceOps mailing list >> VoiceOps@voiceops.org >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > VoiceOps@voiceops.org > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps@voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops