Did you actually read the discussion that I linked to? https://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2014-August/077673.html
To quote from it: > > [...] Outlook sends Reply All to the original sender and anyone > > else that was Cc'd, but not the list. > > > > Is there a fix? Which other variables affect this? > > No, there is no fix. Both behaviors are arguably RFC conforming (the > RFC doesn't specify "Reply to All" behavior of MUAs, so the MUAs can > do whatever they want), and Outlook's is arguably more conformant to > the spirit of the RFC, since according to the RFC the configuration > > From: list at example.com > Reply-To: person at example.org > > has the semantics "the entity using the mailbox 'list at example.com' > requests that you address mail intended for the entity to the mailbox > 'person at example.org'". -- Nathan -----Original Message----- From: J. Hellenthal [mailto:jhellent...@dataix.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2022 7:29 AM To: Nathan Anderson Cc: Voice Ops Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Mailman 'Reply-To' munging (was: Re: 9-8-8 dialing [...]) "Reply-To in different ways" ? It means one thing... am I missing a mail client that does not follow this ? > On Jul 20, 2022, at 06:24, Nathan Anderson via VoiceOps > <voiceops@voiceops.org> wrote: > > "Reply-To" in different ways -- J. Hellenthal The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a lot about anticipated traffic volume. _______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps@voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
