Posted by Eugene Volokh:
Request to Readers Who Have Ari Fleischer's New Book:

   [1]Slate's Chatterbox apparently has a new feature called "The
   Fleischer Watch," "an ongoing inquiry into dishonest or insane
   assertions buried inside Ari Fleischer's White House memoir." The
   first item is:

     In his new book, Taking Heat: The President, the Press, and My
     Years in the White House, Ari Fleischer, the former White House
     press secretary, lays out various "biases and predilections" of
     "the liberal press." Among these is its 'belief that government is
     a mechanism to solve the nation's problems," its insistence that
     "emotional examples of suffering . . . are good ways to illustrate
     economic statistic stories," and its tendency to stay "fixated on
     the unemployment rate." Fleischer might just as well have
     complained that the press believes the Earth revolves around the
     sun.

     At risk of belaboring the obvious:

     1. If the government doesn't exist to solve problems, what the hell
     do we have it for? We can argue about the particular problems
     government should solve, and about how successfully government
     addresses them at any given time, but not, I think, about whether
     government should be in the problem-solving business.

     2. Un-picturesque though they may be, people do tend to suffer when
     the economy is faltering, as it did throughout the period covered
     in Fleischer's memoir. If a lagging economy didn't cause people to
     suffer, there would be no great reason to keep track of the economy
     at all. Anecdotes about individual sufferers help the public
     understand in a concrete way what it means to have a weak economy.

     3. The principal way people suffer when economic growth is weak or
     nonexistent is by losing their jobs. The statistic that keeps track
     of the people who lose their jobs is the unemployment rate (at the
     moment a so-so 5.4 percent). Fleischer doesn't want the press to
     focus on the "micro" story of individual suffering, but neither
     does he want the press to focus on the "macro" story of economic
     statistics. In effect, Fleischer is saying that it's unfair for the
     press to cover the economy at all.

   Now I'm curious what exactly Fleischer said in the book, but I'm
   afraid the UCLA library doesn't yet have it. If any of you have it,
   can find this page, and would be able to fax it or scan and e-mail it
   to me, could you please let me know? My e-mail address is volokh at
   law.ucla.edu, and if you want to fax it, I'll e-mail you my fax number
   (I don't have it at my fingertips right now).

   To foreshadow why I'd like to see this: The quotes originally appeared
   in [2]ABC's The Note (and I believe were credited to Mark Halperin):

     Like every other institution, the Washington and political press
     corps operate with a good number of biases and predilections. . . .

     They include a belief that government is a mechanism to solve the
     nation's problems; that more taxes on corporations and the wealthy
     are good ways to cut the deficit and raise money for social
     spending and don't have a negative affect on economic growth; and
     that emotional examples of suffering (provided by unions or
     consumer groups) are good ways to illustrate economic statistic
     stories. . . .

     [The press] does not accept the proposition that the Bush tax cuts
     helped the economy by stimulating summer spending.

     It remains fixated on the unemployment rate. . . .

   I therefore assume that Fleischer was quoting Halperin. And this makes
   me wonder: Is Noah really claiming that Halperin is dishonest or
   insane? Might Fleischer's statements make some sense, if read in
   context and sensibly interpreted? And where did the ellipsis in
   "emotional examples of suffering . . . are good ways to illustrate
   economic statistic stories" first appear? After all, complaining that
   the media use "emotional examples of suffering (provided by unions or
   consumer groups) are good ways to illustrate economic statistic
   stories" (Halperin's original words, though with emphasis added by me)
   is hardly tantamount to complaining that the media believes the Earth
   revolves around the sun.

References

   1. http://slate.com/id/2114874/
   2. http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/TheNote/TheNote_Feb1004.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
Volokh@lists.powerblogs.com
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to