Posted by Jonathan Adler:
Tribe on Taxing AIG Bonuses:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_03_15-2009_03_21.shtml#1237467992


   Conor Clarke [1]posts Laurence Tribe's views on whether the federal
   government could effectively take back the AIG bonuses without running
   afoul of constitutional prohibitions. Tribe's bottom line:

     It would not be terribly difficult to structure a tax, even one
     that approached a rate of 100%, levied on some or all of the
     bonuses already handed out (or to be handed out in the future) by
     AIG and other recipients of federal bailout funds so that the tax
     would survive bill of attainder clause challenge.

   If Professor Tribe is right, I wonder what such a targeted tax
   provision would look like. Megan McArdle also [2]wonders what
   implications this will have for other institutions that received TARP.

References

   1. 
http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/03/laurence_tribe_is_taxing_aig_legal.php
   2. http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/03/aig_clawbacks_barely_legal.php

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
Volokh@lists.powerblogs.com
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to