Posted by Jonathan Adler:
Mankiw on the Pitfalls of a Public Plan:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_06_28-2009_07_04.shtml#1246217304


   [1]Gregory Mankiw evaluates the risk of a public health care plan.

     Even if one accepts the president�s broader goals of wider access
     to health care and cost containment, his economic logic regarding
     the public option is hard to follow. Consumer choice and honest
     competition are indeed the foundation of a successful market
     system, but they are usually achieved without a public provider. We
     don�t need government-run grocery stores or government-run gas
     stations to ensure that Americans can buy food and fuel at
     reasonable prices.

     An important question about any public provider of health insurance
     is whether it would have access to taxpayer funds. If not, the
     public plan would have to stand on its own financially, as private
     plans do, covering all expenses with premiums from those who signed
     up for it.

     But if such a plan were desirable and feasible, nothing would stop
     someone from setting it up right now. In essence, a public plan
     without taxpayer support would be yet another nonprofit company
     offering health insurance. The fundamental viability of the
     enterprise does not depend on whether the employees are called
     �nonprofit administrators� or �civil servants.�

     In practice, however, if a public option is available, it will
     probably enjoy taxpayer subsidies. Indeed, even if the initial
     legislation rejected them, such subsidies would be hard to avoid in
     the long run. . . .

     Such explicit or implicit subsidies would prevent a public plan
     from providing honest competition for private suppliers of health
     insurance. Instead, the public plan would likely undercut private
     firms and get an undue share of the market.

     President Obama might not be disappointed if that turned out to be
     the case. During the presidential campaign, he said, �If I were
     designing a system from scratch, I would probably go ahead with a
     single-payer system.�

References

   1. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/28/business/economy/28view.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
Volokh@lists.powerblogs.com
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to