Posted by Eugene Volokh:
Now *That's* Child Abuse:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_06_28-2009_07_04.shtml#1246490983


   From Upton v. Upton, 1996 WL 397706 (Conn. Super. Ct.) (emphasis
   added):

     Counsel for the minor children [age 14 and 17 -EV] articulate their
     strong desire to be primarily cared for in their father's home.
     Counsel is able to argue that the children are of a sufficient age
     to tell the court what their preference is, and that that
     preference is not for a manipulative purpose. The court has some
     concern as to the identification of these male children with not
     only their father, but more damaging to them, with their
     grandfather. Whether or not the children feel economic pressure to
     side with their father is unknown.

     The deed has been done, however, and only healing over time will
     determine whether or not these children have an adult relationship
     with their mother. Hating one-half of themselves will not help them
     into the future. The court orders that counsel for the minor
     children read the opinion of the court to the children, and the
     court further requires that the children engage in supportive
     counseling to assist them in expressing their anger with their
     mother, and with their father for bringing them into this battle,
     and leaving them there for so long.

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
Volokh@lists.powerblogs.com
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to