Hi John:
Because when measuring a source with a high resistance you get a different
answer.
Some W.W.II electronics specified 1 kOhm/Volt meters and if you used a VTVM you
got the wrong results.
If a test procedure specifies a 10MOhm input meter and you use a higher input Z
then you may get wrong results.
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
John Phillips wrote:
so why do you care what the input is as long as you know what it is and how
to make it do what you want?
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Brent Gordon <volt-n...@adobe-labs.com>wrote:
Pure conjecture: So that the reading on the 34401A matches that on a $20
DVM.
Or stated differently: So that the input impedance is the same as other
DVMs.
Brent
On 4/10/2014 8:23 AM, Tony wrote:
There is no suggestion in the specifications for the 34401A that the
accuracy suffers by selecting 10G ohm input resistance on the .1 to 10V
range so why would they make 10M ohm the default? I can think of very few
cases where having the 10M ohm i/p resistor switched in is better for
accuracy than not.
On the other hand 10M is sufficiently low to produce significant errors
on a 6 1/2 digit DVM for sources with resistances as low as 10 ohms.
Measuring 1V divided by a 100k/100k ohm divider for example causes a .5%
error - 502.488mV instead of 500.000mV. That might not be a problem but I
wouldn't be surprised if this catches a lot of people out (including me)
when not pausing to do the mental arithmetic to estimate the error. It's
just too easy to be seduced by all those digits into thinking you've made
an accurate measurement even though you discarded those last three digits.
And if it's not a problem then you probably don't need an expensive 6 1/2
digit meter in the first place.
It's a small point I agree but it can get irritating to have to keep
going into the measurement menus to change it when the meter is turned on
when measuring high impedance sources (e.g. capacitor leakage testing).
It can't be to improve i/p protection as 10M is too high to make any
significant difference to ESD and in any case there is plenty of other
over-voltage protection. OK. it provides a path for the DC amplifier's
input bias current, specified to be < 30pA at 25 degrees C, but I imagine
that varies significantly from one meter to the next, and with temperature,
so not useful for nulling out that error.
So why would they do this?
_______________________________________________
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
