Hello,

but if the difference was
10 mV or so, maybe a 3457A would be good enough.

just mentioned that my last answer did not go to the list.
If you have 2 or more LTZ1000 it is usually possible to record differences between them.
I have 6 LTZ1000A and all are within 60 mV.
So I can do measurements either with a K2000 or a 34401A 6.5 digit instrument in 100mV range. Just keep one LTZ under normal conditions and vary the other in environment conditions.

I also average the measurement values over 1 minute to reduce noise of the DMM.
http://www.eevblog.com/forum/metrology/ultra-precision-reference-ltz1000/msg881955/#msg881955
(see picture "DMMs" for the 6.5 digit measurement instruments in a differential TC-measurement).

So there is a good chance that you can also do some measurements on the 3457A in 30 mV range.
you just need enough samples to get all within 30 mV.

I don't know anything about that.

120R is the resistor for the current setpoint
of the data sheet of the LTZ1000 with the 13K temperature setpoint.

If you have a orignial 3458A reference board this resistor is reduced
to 111 Ohms because of the higher temperature setpoint.

Of course that introduces another source of error too, as the buffer would
have some temperature coefficient.

If you use a chopper amplifier like the LTC2057 the additional
temperature drift is below the claimed 0.05 deg C of the LTZ1000.
Additionally you can adjust the overall tempco of the reference by variation of the 400K resistor.
(see EEVBLOG in the long long LTZ1000 thread).

with best regards

Andreas

Am 24.09.2017 um 12:16 schrieb Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd):
On 23 September 2017 at 22:48, Andreas Jahn
wrote:

Hello Dave,

Hello Andreas


there are several things to consider for a travel standard:

- first you might want to have some voltage regulator to stabilize the
voltage.
   the voltage coefficient that I have measured is around 0.3-0.4 ppm/V
   and between full and near empty of 15 cells are 21.8  to 17.2 V.

Good idea. But fairly easy to implement.

I wonder if I could do any useful tests with the 3457A (6.5 digit), by
looking at the difference between the various sources. I don't know how
similar the voltages from these boards will be, but if the difference was
10 mV or so, maybe a 3457A would be good enough.

I did buy a cheap (£350 GBP I think) Keithley 2001 7.5 digit meter, but it
has a few issues, and I deceided to return it.

- the original 3458A board works with a relative high setpoint temperature
of the reference.
   you might want to reduce the temperature setpoint (save current) if the
environment temperature is near room temperature.
   The 15K metal foil (2ppm/K) of the HP-board can be reduced to 13K (metal
foil) like in the data sheet.
   Or if you have a original board you can also parallel 100K (metal film
15ppm/K) to the 15K.

Good idea.

   Or even further down to 12K5 if the environment of the LTZ is not above
30-35 deg C.

I'd probably not go that low. It can get quite hot in here sometimes if the
aircon is off.


   But you might  also want to adapt the 111 R to 120 R to compensate for
the higher Vbe of the transistor when the temperature is lower.

I don't know anything about that.


- If you reduce the setpoint temperature you can also reduce power supply
voltage to 15V or even below.
    I am using 12 * NiMH and stabilize it down to 14.0 V. (with a low
power/low noise LT1763)
    The voltage regulator should not be on the same board or near the LTZ
to achieve optimum voltage coefficient.

http://www.eevblog.com/forum/metrology/ultra-precision-refer
ence-ltz1000/msg875274/#msg875274

Cheers

- you might also want to have some sort of buffer for the output voltage.
   otherwise in case of a short of the output (or excess current) the
temperature setpoint of the heater goes to infinite ...
   the result is a quick ageing of the reference with several ppm shift and
around 6-12 months of larger drifts than usual.

http://www.eevblog.com/forum/metrology/ultra-precision-refer
ence-ltz1000/msg951358/#msg951358

Of course that introduces another source of error too, as the buffer would
have some temperature coefficient.

with best regards

Andreas

Dave


_______________________________________________
volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to