* This is the VOP Radius mailing list *
Dear Eric
I want to ask a question on your suggestion no 2
2) If an incoming Auth request has the exact same CallingStationID
as the one listed, then the user must have dropped..permit it.
question: If there is List of CallingSationID, then how user can connect
from any other number. ?
Regards
Ehsan ul Haq
> * This is the VOP Radius mailing list *
> Todd,
>
> It's all relative. We receive nearly 200,000 STOP records per day.
> We lose some..maybe about a dozen. Often these are from certain
> regions..maybe the carriers reboot the NAS...maybe something
> else..who knows. I have never seen an improvement..but instead
> there are a general 1/10 of 1% loss or fewer.
>
> There are a few things about VOP that I would love if they would implement
> and have been lobbying for years:
>
> 1) If a session limit is assigned to a user, then expire that
> session from the UsersOnline listing after the period has passed..or
> at least allow a "maximum sesssion" value
>
> 2) If an incoming Auth request has the exact same CallingStationID
> as the one listed, then the user must have dropped..permit it.
>
> 3) Currently, there is a linkage between port-limits, UsersOnline,
> and timebanking. It's a queer,unnecessary relationship...they
> should be independently configurable.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Todd
> > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:45 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [VOPRadius] Time Bank
> >
> >
> > * This is the VOP Radius mailing list *
> > Would love to hear from some on the list that are using Time Banking with
> > VOP Radius. We have been using it for some time but see terrible accuracy.
> > We are using it 100% with wholesale network providers like Qwest and such.
> > We are well aware of the problems associated with time banking, outsourced
> > POPs and lost stop packets etc. We still think it should be MUCH more
> > accurate than it is. We use more than one network provider/aggregator and
> > see very poor results with all of them when it comes to time banking.
> >
> > We have tried many things to increase the accuracy like placing our Radius
> > server in different facility with better connections to the net
> > overall. We
> > have tried putting our Vop Radius on a machine with more horsepower and so
> > on. Nothing seems to help really..
> >
> > Are we doomed to basically never have any useful usage data for
> > our subs as
> > long as we use outsourced POP's or is this a problem with Vop Radius and
> > their Time Banking. The reason I ask is because I have had
> > several people in
> > the past laugh when I said I was using Vop Radius for time banking.
> > Basically they said it downright did not work for beans. So, I am not
> > suggesting this is the problem, just trying to see how many of you use it
> > and actually feel it's accurate. It makes it very difficult to run our
> > business with basically useless usage data in our Radius DB.
> >
> > Any input on this is appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Todd
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > **
> > To leave this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > and put the word "LEAVE" in the BODY of the email.
> >
> >
> >
>
> **
> To leave this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> and put the word "LEAVE" in the BODY of the email.
Ehsan ul Haq
Software Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
0300-8540366
**
To leave this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put the word "LEAVE" in the BODY of the email.
