Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:20:25 -0700: Hi Ed, [snip]
Actually Robin, hydrino production has been ruled out. Cells are now sealed and contain a recombiner. If hydrinos were produced and did not react with oxygen to reform water, extra oxygen would accumulate and been detected as increased pressure or extra gas. If they did react, either they would revert to normal D, absorbing their energy of formation, or they would produce abnormal D2O, which has not been seen. In any case, abnormal behavior would be observed.
[snip] Not necessarily, because hydrinohydride could undergo new chemical reactions (i.e. form strange "salts") which could bind any excess oxygen as a solid. (Though I am somewhat grasping at straws here).
Laying all my cards on the table, I would say first, that not all cells are sealed, and secondly that it is highly likely that putative hydrinos are not responsible for all forms of CF, though IMO they may be responsible for at least some past reports of excess heat. In short, I tend to agree with you that there is likely to be *at least* one form of CF/LENR/CANR, that has nothing to do with hydrinos. However I think it's going too far to say that hydrinos have been definitively ruled out as a contender in some cases.
> Well Robin, you just proved the one law that can never be disproven, i.e. in the presence of a clever person, no law can be proven correct.
Regards, Ed
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
All SPAM goes in the trash unread.
