Wesley, read the Student's Guide to Cold Fusion. Most of the major
papers are listed there and their importance is described. A simple
list of papers would not do much good because it is the relationship
between the various observations that is important. An untrained or
uninformed person can not see this relationship very easily, thus the
need for such reviews. As for the skeptics, no amount of reading will
change their minds, so using this method to change minds is a waste of
time.
Regards,
Ed
Wesley Bruce wrote:
I've said to a friend that most critics of cold fusion can't quote or
cite a single paper critical of cold fusion. It's certainly correct in
Australia. but is it correct in all cases. What are the papers critical
of cold fusion and have we debunked them all in turn? We need a list and
counter list on Jeds web site or ISCMNS or some where.
- Re: challenging papers Edmund Storms
-