These papers identified by Mark reveal how "Standard Physics" used fudge factors in complex Dirac equations to fit nature. This issue has not been addressed very well in "standard physics classes" in the US and elsewhere, to my knowledge. I wonder why not?
We have the computational capability of modern computers to thank for the revelation, since they do not need the introduction of fudge factors to "solve" the Dirac equation for various testable physical systems. I think this is what Evans, etal., are saying. Also Evans has taken action to set up a conference (Skype, I think) to review the published theories by the wordpress.com with Elforsk and Gullstrom relative to the Lugano results. Apparently, Axel Westrenius has been instrumental in setting up the conference and suggested the connection of the Lugano results, the Gullstrom paper and the wordpress.com theory cited by Mark. He apparently has been in communication with Evans for some time. It is interesting to note who else is involved and/or participates in the conference. It may have already happened. The plot thickens, as more people are throwing their hat in the ring and hoping for fame associated with explaining the Rossi Effect. Bob From: MarkI-ZeroPoint To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 12:06 AM Subject: RE: [Vo]: Neutron Tunneling Theory regarding Lugano Report-- What I find most interesting is that Elforsk, Gullstrom and Dr. Myron Evans have begun corresponding… Go to this site and do a search for LENR: https://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/ https://drmyronevans.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/a226thpaper.pdf https://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/2012/08/22/for-posting-uft226-sections-1-and-2/ https://drmyronevans.wordpress.com/2012/08/22/for-posting-background-notes-to-uft226/ Evans’ opinion about where fizzix took a wrong turn… “QED and QCD have their hidden adjustable parameters and their unobservables (virtual particles). They are not precise theories at all, and they are plagued with artificially removed infinities (renormalization). With the benefit of forty years of experience in chemical and theoretical physics I think that QED was a wrong turning entirely.” -mark iverson From: Bob Cook [mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 9:34 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]: Neutron Tunneling Theory regarding Lugano Report-- Mats Lewan in a revised addition to his book on Rossi earlier this year has added a comment about a paper from Carl-Oscar Gullström. He mentions that Carl-Oscar Gullström’s paper, “Low Radiation fusion through bound neutron Tunneling” got some positive attention from Bo Höistad, one of the authors of the Lugano report who told Mats: “It is very interesting. It fits like a glove with our results, both the isotopic changes and the absence of radiation. It is the first time that I see a scenario that could explain the results—it has not existed before!” The paper can be found form E-Cat World here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/244393652/Low-radiation-fusion-through-bound-neutron-tunneling This may be the answer to the Rossi effect that the Swedes are looking for. Carl-Oscar is a student at Uppsala University-- Bravo, Bob Cook
