> Edmund Storms wrote: > >> >> >> revtec wrote: >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Edmund Storms" >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >>> Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2005 4:43 PM >>> Subject: Re: OffTopic: Lust and the bible >>> >>> >>> Or do you not know that he who is joined to a harlot is one body with >>> her? >>> For "the two" He says, "shall become one flesh." >> >> >> We all know that we do not become literally one flesh when we have >> sex. We do not even join in any spiritual way. The act is simply the >> sharing of pleasure, except if a child results. The only time "one >> flesh" results is when love is present before the act. Therefore, >> this way of describing the sex act must have a nonliteral meaning. >> What do you think the nonliteral meaning might be?
How about two become electrically one? Harry
