Oops meant to say Li7 and not Li6…
From: Jones Beene Well, according to Rossi – Ni7 and not Ni6 is active - but he is hedging his bets and perpetuating a myth – mentions the nickel-to-copper nonsense - and makes no real progress here. In short - this paper is cannot be taken seriously. A waste of time. Norman Cook is using Rossi to promote his own fringe theory, and that is why we have such a confused mélange of disparate ideas. Sadly, since the paper is electronic, it cannot even be used as fishwrap. From: Frank Znidarsic Interesting paper Jones ideas about lithium are reaffirmed. It mentions the liquid drop model. It does not mention that sound propagates in all liquids. It clearly shows the tetrahedral structure of the nucleus. It makes not mention of the 1.36 fm spacing within the tetrahedral. It makes no mention of an elastic constant and does not attempt to compute the velocity of sound within the nuclear structure. Frank Znidarsic -----Original Message----- From: Roarty, Francis X <francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Tue, Apr 7, 2015 6:38 am Subject: RE: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author Andrea Rossi I would be surprised if the paths outlined in their paper were not already suggested here on vortex since… according to Rossi we only sit back and make countless guesses without ever studying or investing in actual experiment … I think he is feeling the heat on his toes now and casting aspersions while he cherry picks ideas from vortex authors and tries to rewrap them in fresh terms so we won’t recognize them:_) but he also admits he doesn’t know the source of the energy either – his paper pushes the quantum features established by the lattice on the IPM and effects on spin coupling..sound familiar? I do like that he pushes the field down to the angstrom level but still believe this is accomplished via relativistic effect [Naudt’s 05 paper] and the angstrom level he is promoting is only a relative measure not really occurring from the perspective of the local tiny observer. [snipbut theory alone provides no clue on how sufficient energy could lead to these nuclear reactions. While this theoretical stalemate remains unresolved, however, we demonstrate below how specific isotopic structures in the lattice IPM could in principle lead to the strong depletion of 7Li4,[/snip] From: Peter Gluck [mailto:peter.gl...@gmail.com <mailto:peter.gl...@gmail.com?> ] Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 5:18 AM To: Arik El Boher; Bo Hoistadt; Brian Ahern; CMNS; Dagmar Kuhn; doug marker; Dr. Braun Tibor; eCatNews; Gabriel Moagar-Poladian; Gary; Haiko Lietz; jeff aries; Lewan Mats; Nicolaie N. Vlad; Peter Mobberley; Pierre Clauzon; Roberto Germano; Roy Virgilio; Sunwon Park; vlad; VORTEX; Mark Tsirlin; Steve Katinski; David Daggett; Valerio Ciampoli; Peter Bjorkbom Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:mainstream physics paper bout the Hot Cat, co-author Andrea Rossi Dear Friends, Again a midday edition of Ego Out- - bis dat qui cito dat- I know you all are curious to see it http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/04/rossi-is-co-author-of-mainstream.html Let's read and discuss the paper I already know what will it change. I hope the theorists will speak. Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
