Oh, I did ask Stan Szpak if he thought the Pd-D and Ni-H reactions were
the same and he said, No, they are different, so my conclusion was not his.
On 4/12/15 3:21 PM, Ruby wrote:
Hi James, they did not speak about that substitution, and I am not
sure if they did that or not. I do not recall reading that in the
subset of papers I have "read".
There was a time limit interviewing Stan Szpak as he has some health
issues. He also had a lot to say, so I hardly got to ask questions;
he just kept talking on about what he wanted, and then we had to go.
It is just really something that you can get such heat generated from
palladium and H2O. That seems to further the notion that the
reactions from Pd-D and Ni-H are of the same ilk, does it not? How do
we explain this otherwise?
There is so much to bring to light from these earlier experiments.
On 4/12/15 2:00 PM, James Bowery wrote:
Its rather maddening that they got thermal runaway in 3 out of 10
trials in a very simple set up using *light* water and palladium but
they never thought to replace the palladium salts with *nickel* salts
to*codeposit nickel* rather than palladium.
Or did they and they simply did not talk about it?
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Ruby <r...@hush.com
<mailto:r...@hush.com>> wrote:
I made a new movie called Following Nature's Documents Stan Szpak
LENR Co-deposition (18:28):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxBJjWzlKl0
--
Ruby Carat
Eureka, CA USA
1-707-616-4894
r...@coldfusionnow.org
www.coldfusionnow.org
lenrexplained.com
--
Ruby Carat
Eureka, CA USA
1-707-616-4894
r...@coldfusionnow.org <mailto:r...@coldfusionnow.org>
www.coldfusionnow.org <http://www.coldfusionnow.org>
lenrexplained.com <http://www.lenrexplained.com>
