1. Andrea Rossi December 29th, 2013 at 8:20 AM <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=833&cpage=4#comment-891592>
Steven N Karels: 1- yes 2- yes 3- moreless yes About the temperature: during the destructive tests the temperature raises for some second well above the melting point of Ni. This is why the “Mouse” cannot excite over a certain limit the E-Cat to maintain well stabilized operation. Warm Regards, A.R. On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > 1. Andrea Rossi > December 29th, 2013 at 6:10 PM > <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=833&cpage=4#comment-891804> > > Hank Mills: > 1- no > 2- confidential > 3- no > 4- the temperature of the Cat raises when the Mouse is turned off, > lowers when the Mouse is turned on > Warm Regards, > A.R. > > > On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ndrea Rossi >> May 1st, 2015 at 7:48 AM >> <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=876&cpage=9#comment-1075473> >> >> BroKeeper: >> The ssm is enhanced by the fact that with the control system directing >> multiple reactors we can obtain a synergy between them using some of the >> reactors to drive others, where the driving ones ( mouse operation) are >> less than the cat ones. This way the ssm phases are substantially more that >> the driving ones. This synergy, obviously, is possible only with big plants >> ( so far). >> I cannot give the numbers, as correctly Steven N Karels anticipated and, >> also, after consulting Orsobubu, I have to add that what we have now is not >> the final result, things can worsen substantially in time and the final >> results could be either positive or negative ( this last phrase could be >> substituted by F-Something). >> Warm Regards, >> A.R. >> >> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> How does the Mouse drive the Cat? >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> About the E-cat symphony, My occam razor vision is that the E-cat is a >>>> quite complex system which have to be controlled according to good >>>> "automatic control" practices, for linear and nonlinear systems. >>>> >>>> the way it works better with said "self-sustained mode" make me think >>>> that there are different time constant and multiple derivation degrees >>>> involved in the differential equations. (hard to say in english for me). >>>> >>>> for me SSM is a bit like a 1-piston engine. >>>> what Rossi talk about symphony is probably a 9 cylinders radial engine. >>>> >>>> for the rest I think that linear and non-linear control theory are >>>> used, in a context where the model is not very well known. >>>> >>>> I suspect that it is simply heat transfer coupled with LENR reaction >>>> that build the differential equations. probably the electric control just >>>> bootstrap and synchronized the 9-cylinders, like starter and spark plug. >>>> >>>> 2015-06-06 22:31 GMT+02:00 Axil Axil <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> What is the nature of the E cat music? Music as we know it is carried >>>>> in the air as sound. It involves vibrations in the air. Air carries music >>>>> to us. >>>>> >>>>> In the E Cat, Hot Cat and so on, vibration is carries by dipole motion >>>>> of electrons on the surface of the micro particles. When all the micro >>>>> particles are in resonance, all the electrons on all the nickel micro >>>>> particles are vibrating in unison. This is called a Bose Einstein >>>>> condensate. All the dipoles become one and are in sync. >>>>> >>>>> These dipoles put out a strong EMF field that can influence other >>>>> dipoles in other reactors. It may be that many reactors in the cluster >>>>> become synchronize to form a global Bose Einstein condensate where all the >>>>> dipoles keep each other in sync. This common background EMF field may >>>>> allow >>>>> for reactors to share energy between one another via a common EMF field >>>>> that surrounds the cluster. In such a condition input power may not be >>>>> needed to pump the dipoles between and among the reactors in the cluster. >>>>> >>>>> Maybe Rossi has discovered how to interconnect the reactors in his >>>>> cluster to share in the dipole vibrations by using an EMF based backbone >>>>> interconnect so that all the dipoles are joined together in a cluster wide >>>>> Bose condinsate.? >>>>> >>>>> “The Mouse has a driving license, of course!” >>>>> >>>>> The Mouse may be a driver of the dipole vibrations. This could be how >>>>> the mouse drives the Cat. >>>>> >>>>> An experiment to try to verify this idea is to have a reactor made up >>>>> of a stack of multiple alumina tubes. Place fuel in all the tubes, but >>>>> power only one of the tubes with a heater. Let us call that powered >>>>> reactor >>>>> :"the mouse". This mouse has a reduced fuel load as in the last MFMP test >>>>> to keep it from blowout. The other tubes are fully loaded with fuel and >>>>> use >>>>> the heat from the mouse and the EMF generated by the mouse to produce the >>>>> reaction in all the fully fueled tubes. >>>>> >>>>> The EMF field that comes from the Mouse might keep all the other >>>>> reactors in the stack in check even if they are fully loaded with fuel. >>>>> >>>>> Rossi might have thought that just a demo of the mouse at Lagano would >>>>> not show his technology. He might be using a reactor stack to produce self >>>>> sustain mode. >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> My dear Readers, >>>>>> >>>>>> I have just published >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/06/questionless-survey-re-lenr-ideology.html >>>>>> >>>>>> It opens the possibility of a huge feedback. >>>>>> >>>>>> Peter >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>>>>> Cluj, Romania >>>>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
