Dear Frank Acland: while the E-Cat is turned on, no other source of energy comes to the system. When the Mouse is turned on, the E-Cat is turned off and in this phase the Activator draws energy from the heat source. When the E-Cat is turned on ( about 65% of the operational time) the denominator is zero, no energy comes from any source to heat the Activator and the E-Cat, while the E-Cat is turned off ( about 35% of the operational time) the activator draws energy from the heat source, but at the same time produces for the Customer an amount of heat that is equal or more than the energy consumed, so that irt is pays the energy that consumes by itself. Warm Regards,
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > f we give too much energy to the reactor the temperature raises above the > controllability limits and the reactor explodes. We must maintain the drive > below this limit, and it is what we are learning to do, trying to reach a > controllability level at the highest temperature possible, because the COP > raises exponentially with the operation temperature. The apparatus is made > by two well separated components, the activator ( “mouse”) and the energy > catalyzar ( “Cat”). Now we have a mouse with a COP above 1 and a Cat with a > COP with zero energy consumption. If the Mouse excites the cat too much, > the cat gets wild and explodes. We must not risk to reach this level. We > have seen explode hunderds of reactors now, this way. > > Warm Regards, > > ========================= > > This post by Rossi shows that the Cat is not powered. All the stimulation > comes from the mouse. If the powered reactor (Mouse) can excite N numbers > of non powered reactors (Cats), the COP of this clusters of reactors will > be relativly high. > > On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> 1. Andrea Rossi >> December 29th, 2013 at 8:20 AM >> <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=833&cpage=4#comment-891592> >> >> Steven N Karels: >> 1- yes >> 2- yes >> 3- moreless yes >> About the temperature: during the destructive tests the temperature >> raises for some second well above the melting point of Ni. This is why the >> “Mouse” cannot excite over a certain limit the E-Cat to maintain well >> stabilized operation. >> Warm Regards, >> A.R. >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> 1. Andrea Rossi >>> December 29th, 2013 at 6:10 PM >>> <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=833&cpage=4#comment-891804> >>> >>> Hank Mills: >>> 1- no >>> 2- confidential >>> 3- no >>> 4- the temperature of the Cat raises when the Mouse is turned off, >>> lowers when the Mouse is turned on >>> Warm Regards, >>> A.R. >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> ndrea Rossi >>>> May 1st, 2015 at 7:48 AM >>>> <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=876&cpage=9#comment-1075473> >>>> >>>> BroKeeper: >>>> The ssm is enhanced by the fact that with the control system directing >>>> multiple reactors we can obtain a synergy between them using some of the >>>> reactors to drive others, where the driving ones ( mouse operation) are >>>> less than the cat ones. This way the ssm phases are substantially more that >>>> the driving ones. This synergy, obviously, is possible only with big plants >>>> ( so far). >>>> I cannot give the numbers, as correctly Steven N Karels anticipated >>>> and, also, after consulting Orsobubu, I have to add that what we have now >>>> is not the final result, things can worsen substantially in time and the >>>> final results could be either positive or negative ( this last phrase could >>>> be substituted by F-Something). >>>> Warm Regards, >>>> A.R. >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> How does the Mouse drive the Cat? >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> About the E-cat symphony, My occam razor vision is that the E-cat is >>>>>> a quite complex system which have to be controlled according to good >>>>>> "automatic control" practices, for linear and nonlinear systems. >>>>>> >>>>>> the way it works better with said "self-sustained mode" make me think >>>>>> that there are different time constant and multiple derivation degrees >>>>>> involved in the differential equations. (hard to say in english for me). >>>>>> >>>>>> for me SSM is a bit like a 1-piston engine. >>>>>> what Rossi talk about symphony is probably a 9 cylinders radial >>>>>> engine. >>>>>> >>>>>> for the rest I think that linear and non-linear control theory are >>>>>> used, in a context where the model is not very well known. >>>>>> >>>>>> I suspect that it is simply heat transfer coupled with LENR reaction >>>>>> that build the differential equations. probably the electric control just >>>>>> bootstrap and synchronized the 9-cylinders, like starter and spark plug. >>>>>> >>>>>> 2015-06-06 22:31 GMT+02:00 Axil Axil <[email protected]>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> What is the nature of the E cat music? Music as we know it is >>>>>>> carried in the air as sound. It involves vibrations in the air. Air >>>>>>> carries >>>>>>> music to us. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In the E Cat, Hot Cat and so on, vibration is carries by dipole >>>>>>> motion of electrons on the surface of the micro particles. When all the >>>>>>> micro particles are in resonance, all the electrons on all the nickel >>>>>>> micro >>>>>>> particles are vibrating in unison. This is called a Bose Einstein >>>>>>> condensate. All the dipoles become one and are in sync. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> These dipoles put out a strong EMF field that can influence other >>>>>>> dipoles in other reactors. It may be that many reactors in the cluster >>>>>>> become synchronize to form a global Bose Einstein condensate where all >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> dipoles keep each other in sync. This common background EMF field may >>>>>>> allow >>>>>>> for reactors to share energy between one another via a common EMF field >>>>>>> that surrounds the cluster. In such a condition input power may not be >>>>>>> needed to pump the dipoles between and among the reactors in the >>>>>>> cluster. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Maybe Rossi has discovered how to interconnect the reactors in his >>>>>>> cluster to share in the dipole vibrations by using an EMF based backbone >>>>>>> interconnect so that all the dipoles are joined together in a cluster >>>>>>> wide >>>>>>> Bose condinsate.? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> “The Mouse has a driving license, of course!” >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The Mouse may be a driver of the dipole vibrations. This could be >>>>>>> how the mouse drives the Cat. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> An experiment to try to verify this idea is to have a reactor made >>>>>>> up of a stack of multiple alumina tubes. Place fuel in all the tubes, >>>>>>> but >>>>>>> power only one of the tubes with a heater. Let us call that powered >>>>>>> reactor >>>>>>> :"the mouse". This mouse has a reduced fuel load as in the last MFMP >>>>>>> test >>>>>>> to keep it from blowout. The other tubes are fully loaded with fuel and >>>>>>> use >>>>>>> the heat from the mouse and the EMF generated by the mouse to produce >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> reaction in all the fully fueled tubes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The EMF field that comes from the Mouse might keep all the other >>>>>>> reactors in the stack in check even if they are fully loaded with fuel. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rossi might have thought that just a demo of the mouse at Lagano >>>>>>> would not show his technology. He might be using a reactor stack to >>>>>>> produce >>>>>>> self sustain mode. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My dear Readers, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have just published >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/06/questionless-survey-re-lenr-ideology.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It opens the possibility of a huge feedback. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Dr. Peter Gluck >>>>>>>> Cluj, Romania >>>>>>>> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
