On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:

Without the lattice that receives and directs the EMF into the nanopowder,
> a powerful light source such as a laser will be powerful enough to produce
> LENR in just nanopowder alone.
> This particular behavior was observed in experiments where a laser
> irradiated gold nanopowder dissolved in water. The uranium and thorium
> salts that was dissolved in that water underwent a fission reaction. This
> says that muons where produced to canalize fission instead of neutrons.
>

Here I think you're referring to this study [1], which you've referred to
several times in the past [e.g., 2] (please correct me if I have the wrong
study).  I didn't appreciate this paper until now.  The authors present an
interesting set of experimental results, in which, at face value, the decay
of thorium and its daughters was induced.  They think it might have
occurred through focusing of the laser that was used.

Another possibility is that it was induced by electron screening decreasing
the Coulomb barrier width to alpha decay, and by increased electron
presence in the nucleus, thereby increasing the electron capture and beta
decay rates.  Here are some relevant reactions of these kinds:

% python scripts/reactions.py "Hg,Ta,Au,Th" --ascii --model induced-decay
e- + 227Th => e- + 4He + 223Ra + 6147 keV               ->A, A, trace
e- + 228Th => e- + 4He + 224Ra + 5520 keV               ->A, A, trace
e- + 229Th => e- + 4He + 225Ra + 5168 keV               ->B-, A, trace
e- + 230Th => e- + 4He + 226Ra + 4770 keV               ->A, A, trace
e- + 231Th => e- + 4He + 227Ra + 4213 keV               ->B-, A
e- + 232Th => e- + 4He + 228Ra + 4082 keV               ->B-, A, trace
e- + 234Th => e- + 4He + 230Ra + 3673 keV               ->B-, A
e- + 180Ta => e- + 4He + 176Lu + 2098 keV               ->B-, A, in nature
e- + 196Hg => e- + 4He + 192Pt + 2040 keV               A, in nature
e- + 181Ta => e- + 4He + 177Lu + 1519 keV               ->B-, A
e- + 198Hg => e- + 4He + 194Pt + 1383 keV               A, in nature
e- + 197Au => e- + 4He + 193Ir + 972 keV                A, in nature
e- + 180Ta => e- + neutrino + 180Hf + 921 keV
e- + 199Hg => e- + 4He + 195Pt + 825 keV                A, in nature
e- + 180Ta => e- + neutrino + 180W + 778 keV            ->A
e- + 200Hg => e- + 4He + 196Pt + 718 keV                A, in nature
e- + 231Th => e- + neutrino + 231Pa + 391 keV           ->A
e- + 201Hg => e- + 4He + 197Pt + 334 keV                ->B-, A
e- + 234Th => e- + neutrino + 234Pa + 274 keV           ->B-, ->SF, trace
e- + 202Hg => e- + 4He + 198Pt + 135 keV                A, in nature


Note the presence of gold among the parents.

They saw increased gamma activity.  Perhaps this activity went back to the
daughters of beta decay reactions being populated in excited states.  They
saw a hydrogen isotope effect, where irradiation under D2O resulted in
decreased gamma activity while H2O did not.  I have no idea what this would
come from.  (Note that this is different than saying that fewer decays took
place; perhaps more were to the ground state when D2O was used.)

What would cause increased electron presence in the nucleus?  Perhaps the
excitation of orbital electrons to s-shells by the laser frequency.
Electrons in s-shells don't have a node in the nucleus and hence spend a
portion of their time there.

Eric



[1] http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0906/0906.4268.pdf
[2] https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg104837.html

Reply via email to