The EMdrive and LENR spring from the same physical mechanism. They are two peas in a pod. This mechanism is the separation of positive and negative vacuum energy using strong asymmetrical EMF fields. I have recently posted on this mechanism in the E-Cat world thread
"LENR Produces Eternal Cosmic Inflation" http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/11/01/lenr-produces-eternal-cosmic-inflation-axil-axil/. <http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/11/01/lenr-produces-eternal-cosmic-inflation-axil-axil/> When a microwave EMF field is setup in an asymmetric shaped enclosure, a pattern of standing EMF waves are generated. This wave pattern produces positive and negative interference zones. These zones separate the vacuum into associated zones of positive and negative vacuum energy. Negative energy is responsible for the generation of dark or repulsive gravity. This dark gravity is responsible for the ongoing cosmic inflation that is currently perplexing science. This repulsive force is being produced by hydrogen in space through an active and constant LENR mechanism. Negative vacuum energy is the gateway to quantum worm holes. This is the mechanism that LENR uses to bypass the coulomb barrier where energy is teleported(AKA transferred) from the site of nuclear reconfiguration to the bubble of negative vacuum energy inside the SPP. Because the mechanism of vacuum energy produces both reactionless propulsion and LENR, it may be possible at some future time to produce a space drive from LENR of a LENR reactor from asymmetric wave interference as exists in the EMdrive. It also may to possible to open a worm hole using LENR where space travelers can bypass spacetime to transfer themselves to remote locations in space and time through the 5th dimension. [image: Thumbnail] <http://hiqnews.megafoundation.org/imageA91.JPG> See below for further study on this subject: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/negativeenergy/negativeenergy.htm On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Roarty, Francis X < [email protected]> wrote: > Yes, I respect goat guys’ comments even though he is skeptical of all > things LENR or over unity, his positions are always logical and well > founded. If you had to pick someone from the skeptics side to weigh in on > an LENR theory he would be a good choice – may not tell you what you want > to hear but you will get an honest analysis. > > fran > > > > *From:* Bob Cook [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 03, 2015 10:00 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:EM drive at NASA > > > > Fran- > > > > Thanks for that link—very interesting. The comments of “Goatguy” on the > item following the article are also quite interesting. He gives a nice > description of the significance of “Q”, a dimensionless resonance > multiplying factor affected by various engineering schemes to increase > thrust to energy input ratios of the EM drive. > > > > The same sort of Q ideas may be appropriate for the design of LENR devices > to improve/define their performance. For example, Q associated with the > size of nano Ni in a reactor affecting resonant conditions may have a large > impact on the design. Or Q associated with the Li-H fuel mix and > appropriate laser frequencies may be important. > > > > Bob Cook > > > > *From:* Roarty, Francis X <[email protected]> > > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 03, 2015 3:30 AM > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* [Vo]:EM drive at NASA > > > > Upgraded model testing in process. > > > > http://nextbigfuture.com/2015/11/nasa-eagleworks-has-tested-upgraded.html > > >
