to be clear, as far as I understood, keeping Gr and standard model QM,
Endrive cannot work, point, no way to get around.
Shawyer sure have made computation error, or shortcut to pretend he
conserve momentum, but his formula seems to work not bad, so behind it
there is probably a reality.

Something have to be corrected, maybe just slightly as usual.

I follow the works of Mike McCulloch with MiHsC theory of quantized
inertia, but it is unfinished.
Either he is wrong, or he is like Einstein before he formulates GR with
tensor algebra.
http://physicsfromtheedge.blogspot.co.uk/2015/10/explaining-mihsc-with-schematics.html
http://physicsfromtheedge.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/mihsc-and-emdrive-clarification.html
http://physicsfromtheedge.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/mihsc-101.html

Vaccuum plasma cannot by definition make EmDrive work with GR+QM...
but it is the key with MiHsC...

Future will say. the simplest would be that it is an artifact, but that
won't be funny, and Nature likes fun.

2015-11-03 16:51 GMT+01:00 Roarty, Francis X <[email protected]>:

> Yes, I respect goat guys’ comments even though he is skeptical of all
> things LENR or over unity, his positions are always logical and well
> founded.  If you had to pick someone from the skeptics side to weigh in on
> an LENR theory he would be a good choice – may not tell you what you want
> to hear but you will get an honest analysis.
>
> fran
>
>
>
> *From:* Bob Cook [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 03, 2015 10:00 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:EM drive at NASA
>
>
>
> Fran-
>
>
>
> Thanks for that link—very interesting.  The comments of “Goatguy” on the
> item following the article are also quite interesting.  He gives a nice
> description of the significance of “Q”, a dimensionless resonance
> multiplying factor affected by various engineering schemes to increase
> thrust to energy input ratios of the EM drive.
>
>
>
> The same sort of Q ideas may be appropriate for the design of LENR devices
> to improve/define their performance.  For example, Q associated with the
> size of nano Ni in a reactor affecting resonant conditions may have a large
> impact on the design.  Or Q associated with the Li-H fuel mix and
> appropriate laser frequencies may be important.
>
>
>
> Bob Cook
>
>
>
> *From:* Roarty, Francis X <[email protected]>
>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 03, 2015 3:30 AM
>
> *To:* [email protected]
>
> *Subject:* [Vo]:EM drive at NASA
>
>
>
> Upgraded model testing in process.
>
>
>
> http://nextbigfuture.com/2015/11/nasa-eagleworks-has-tested-upgraded.html
>
>
>

Reply via email to