https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZeHFNWFElk
Making Monopoles in the Lab This is a good find. The method to produce a analog magnetic monopole is to get all the spins of the members of the condensate to point in the same direction and overlap. The Surface Plasmon Polariton is such a quantum spin liquid that forms a spin condensate where all the spins of the polaritons overlap. This SPP produces a monopole magnetic field in simulation of a fundamental unitary monopole. On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > The magic in Rydberg matter is not in the molecules themselves but how the > molecules reformate EMF input to produce magnetic monopoles . The graphite > like staking of a long stings of hexagon shaped plates produce EMF monopole > magnetic projections. Water crystals have the same sting like structure of > stacked graphite like plates and produce the same LENR results even though > these water molecules feature both oxygen and hydrogen,. > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> Mark, >> >> It would not be a surprise if Holmlid et al - have gotten this detail (2.3 >> pm) wrong, but it seems like a minor point in the big picture. >> >> They could be sitting on the discovery of the century. IMO it is a waste >> of time to dwell on that type of detail, when there is so much at stake >> on the larger claim of MeV ions. If really there are MeV ions then why >> not use your resources working on a foolproof method to show this, and >> let the large labs worry about the spacing details sometime in the future >> ? >> >> It strikes me that they could be overlooking easy ways to demonstrate and >> characterize the ions, because: >> >> 1) They are charged and high energy >> >> 2) Therefore they can be contained, steered and focused with >> magnetics >> >> 3) They are of sufficient strength to create spallation and >> secondary reactions in many targets >> >> 4) The spallation signatures are known – neutrons are expected from >> simple lead targets >> >> 5) Many, many ways are available to characterize a focused beam of >> MeV ions. >> >> 6) I cannot help but label this as misguided - reminiscent of >> counting the angels on the head of a pin… >> >> >> Who cares about the exact spacing at this juncture. Prove the fast ions >> and everyone will beat a path to your door ! >> >> *From:* Mark Jurich >> >> A recent paper (article in press) has appeared (about a month ago?), >> submitted just before the Olafsson talks in the SF Bay Area, a couple >> months ago: >> >> >> >> *http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319915304687* >> <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319915304687> >> >> >> >> In it, the authors attempt to address an argument posed by some that an >> Inter-nuclear Distance of 2.3 pm in D(0) is unphysical, and I thought I >> would open this up to comment/debate on Vortex-L (section of paper >> reproduced as best as possible, below): >> >> >> >> * Contrary to expectation, the argument that the measured short >> distances in D(0) (in general H(0)) are unphysical is sometimes met. The >> basic idea behind this argument appears to be that the inter-nuclear >> Coulomb repulsion would prevent the clusters to reach such small >> inter-nuclear distances. Amazingly, the same argument is also put forward >> for the electrons, which are said to repel each other strongly. In Ref. >> [1] these points are already answered: “A pair D-D or p-p contains two >> electrons and two ions. No inner electrons of course exist for hydrogen, >> and thus the ions are bare protons or deuterons, of very small size >> relative to the pm sized interparticle distances. The pair-wise >> interactions between the four particles, with the interaction distances of >> similar size, are two repulsive terms (++ and -- ) and four attractive >> terms (+- ). Thus, such a pair increases its stability with shorter >> distance scale as 1/r. At a typical inter-particle distance of 2.3 pm, the >> total electrostatic energy is of the order of 1 keV thus a bound state. >> With different spin states for the two electrons, they may fill the same >> space and one of the repulsive terms ( --) disappears effectively. Thus, >> the stability of a pair of atoms in the ultra-dense form is increased by >> different electron spin states.” Of course, the bound state energy of 1 >> keV is directly calculable from the Coulomb energy terms.* >> >> >> >> * To clear the thinking, consider that each positive nuclei in the D-D >> pair is closer to its electron, thus giving two almost neutral entities. >> In that case, there are no repulsive forces of importance at all, and the >> system can be shrunk at will, always keeping the attractive (+-) distances >> smaller than the repulsive distances. This means that there is no >> electrostatic problem to form a D-D pair of pm size. Such a D-D pair can >> shrink transiently almost indefinitely to a neutral particle of nuclear >> size. Since the deuterons are bosons, and the electrons which are fermions >> pair with different spins in the same volume, there is neither any quantum >> mechanical effects which prevent the formation of a pair D-D in D(0). It >> must be remembered that the D(0) material is not a plasma but a condensed >> material formed by pairs D-D attached together in chain clusters [1]. Such >> clusters have the form D subscript(2N) with the D-D pairs rotating around >> the central axis of the cluster [5]. A related problem is the nature of >> the cluster bonding. It is apparent from the numerous studies that D(0) is >> in a stationary state, since otherwise the bond distance would vary >> strongly in the experiments. That D(0) is in a stationary state means that >> the applicable Heisenberg uncertainty relation is (Delta E)(Delta t) >= >> h-bar/2, with Delta t large (at least seconds - weeks [34]) and thus Delta >> E small. Thus, there is no fundamental quantum mechanical effect which >> prevents the formation of stable D(0) with its 2.3 pm bond distances.* >> >> >> >> *[1] Holmlid L. Excitation levels in ultra-dense hydrogen p( 1) and d( 1) >> clusters: structure of spin-based Rydberg Matter. Int J Mass Spectrom >> 2013;352:1-8.* >> >> *[5] Holmlid L. Experimental studies and observations of clusters of >> Rydberg matter and its extreme forms. J Clust Sci 2012;23:5-34.* >> >> *[34] Badiei S, Andersson PU, Holmlid L. Production of ultra-dense >> deuterium, a compact future fusion fuel. Appl Phys Lett 2010;96:124103.* >> >> >> >> Mark Jurich >> > >
