On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For those who noticed > - the message of Brian Josephson whistleblowing some exchange between > moderator to block Ferara tests > - the effective blocking of lugano test > > there is an article by Nicolas Gisin (an insider of science, not a rebel) > http://www.iqoqi-vienna.at/nicolas-gisin/ > > Nature try to reframe the debate > > http://www.nature.com/news/arxiv-rejections-lead-to-spat-over-screening-process-1.19267 > > > From the Nature link: "Sabine Hossenfelder, an expert on quantum gravity at the Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies in Germany, says that the black-hole paper is scientific and clearly argued, but is wrong because it uses an equation in a slightly different regime to that in which it should be applied. She calls this a “common and understandable mistake”. Instead of being wrong the conclusion should be seen as a reductio ad absurdum demonstration of the incompatibility of quantum mechanics and general relativity. Without a quantum theory of gravity the entire field of black hole physics is based on discretion rather than logic. Harry
