Mills talked about the source voltage being "only 10V", but 10V has at least the potential to deliver 10eV of energy. 10eV of energy is the energy of a photon at 124nm in the extreme UV. His "only 10V" statement was meant to dissuade the listener that high energy photons were not possible directly from this source.
He also has the habit of immensely glossing over engineering details. When he talked about getting rid of 65% of 250kW (163kW) of heat using an "automobile radiator", he forgot to notice that an automobile engine only dissipates that much heat at high speed and only then for short bursts. If a car is trying to dissipate that much heat while standing still, it will overheat immediately. Yes, you can use a radiator to dissipate 163kW of heat, but it will be huge and fan cooled. He talked about not having to throttle this thing, while having it in a car. Without throttling the heat source, when the car comes to an idle, it is still trying to dissipate 163kW of heat, and a car sized radiator will immediately overheat. He would need a radiator bigger than the car for this. The same is true for parking it in a garage and using it to power the building. How will you get the heat out of the parked car? How will you get it out of the garage? All doable, but not in an easy engineering fashion as he suggests as being trivial. Even still, my mentor used to say, "The best things are invented by those who don't know it can't be done." On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < > stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If you think that Mills is an empty bag of promises then why don't you >> challenge some of his academic work, like the experiments leading to EUV >> spectra. Non have step up and claimed that those results are wrong or have >> a credible natural explanation (axil publish a paper if you want acceptance >> here). >> > > A lack of (published) refutation does not mean a conjecture is correct, > and says very little about the conjecture. I personally do not take a > position on whether BLP are seeing excess power; I'm optimistic that they > might be. > > About the EUV spectrum (and soft x-ray spectrum) -- this kind of spectrum > might also be generated by the stopping of hot beta electrons, which will > be a more plausible hypothesis to some than Hydrinos. > > Eric > >
