How about the Maxwell-boltzmann distribution?
http://ibchem.com/IB/ibnotes/full/sta_htm/Maxwell_Boltzmann.htm

Lower temperatures have higher peaks which is the opposite of a
blackbody distribution.

Harry

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> One of the researchers that I discussed this with suggested that the
> spectrum looked like a blackbody radiation.  I did some analysis and can
> tell you that it does NOT look like blackbody radiation.  Blackbody
> radiation cuts off very sharply on the high energy side.  At 100 million
> degrees, there would be some energy at 100keV, but by the time it got to
> 1MeV, the blackbody radiation would have declined by 40 orders of magnitude.
> That is not what is seen here.
>
> It is really hard to explain a continuous spectrum that looks like it
> probably spans at least 2 orders of magnitude in photon energy with maximum
> energies over 1MeV.  The best explanations so far (and there has not been a
> chance for widespread vetting) are that it is due to:  1) Bremsstrahlung
> from really high energy light charged particles [electrons, positrons] with
> a distribution of energy, or 2) interference in the NaI detector by a flux
> of neutral particles causing the apparent spectrum by activation of the Na,
> I, and Th in the detector crystal.
>
> Thank you for the links.  I will have a look these papers.
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> The peak is at least 10x more than that of you provided...
>>
>> Bob Higgins, in my work with Akito, I proposed that in cold fusion you
>> have, unlike the conventional fusion, the fusion of more than 2 nuclei.
>> There are not experiments with more than 2 nuclei fusioning (C12 is formed
>> by B8, which is stable for 10^-15s, I am talking here of something less than
>> 10^-23s in coincidence). This will form an excited ball that will shine at a
>> few kev. There will surely be brehmstralung, from this weak gama rays.
>>
>> http://vixra.org/abs/1209.0057
>>
>> http://vixra.org/abs/1401.0202
>
>

Reply via email to