Jeff's setup may be more sensitive to radon than Alan's.  The NaI detector
that Alan used is only sensitive to gamma, and not beta.  Radon decay
chains are primarily alpha and beta emissions.  With the foil wrapped
around Jeff's GM detector, he probably does not have much alpha
sensitivity, but he will still have beta sensitivity - which could come
from radon.  Beta and alpha sensitivity can be evaluated with check
sources.  If Jeff is in the same area as Alan, he could borrow Alan's check
sources, but I am not sure if Alan has a beta source.  A good 24 hour
background collection would also be useful as a null test to look for radon
caused variation.

On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:

> *From:* Jack Cole
>
>
>
> Ø       Jeff Morriss has just published a nice study showing radiation of
> 7x background.
>
>
> *https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/2847-Celani-Type-Replication/*
> <https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/2847-Celani-Type-Replication/>
>
> This is nice. Here is one comment to file away as a possible mundane
> explanation.
>
> Jeff Morriss is in the same general geographic area as  Alan Goldwater,
> and is probably working in his garage. Radon gas is known to be high in
> Alan’s area, and probably in Jeff’s also -- and 7x background is fully
> explainable by radon, if it is there… as is the apparent half-life average
> .
>
> … but wait, you say, Jeff did calibrate against background before seeing
> the higher rate, and also the half-life of 222Rn is about 4 days, not one
> hour.
>
> Yes, but this calibration would not eliminate the source being Radon,
> since he is running a charged wire experiment - and when the experiment is
> turned on, it would attract radon to the wire and thus concentrate the
> signal. Plus a factor of 7 concentration is not unusual; plus the average
> of all three radon isotopes can be in the one hour half-life range.
>
> Therefore – the source of radiation could be radon. At least it has not
> yet been ruled out.
>
> One way to lessen radon is to move the experiment outside, or to an area
> of lower radon emission (assuming it is high at Jeff’s location).
>

Reply via email to