Can anyone really argue though that the conservation of energy is not merely a general observation and a philosophical concept.
It is fine to say "I can't see how it could be done" given the assumption that there is symmetry in the underlying mechanics of simultaneous creation of one energy and the destruction of another which is generally called transfer of energy. But that is not the same as it being actually IMPOSSIBLE to create or destroy energy! It's just an idea. A presumption. Much like the observation that entropy increases over time is known to only be generally true, but false in special circumstances (low power LED's can gain energy from the vacuum). Maybe energy can be created or destroyed in a net manner by some alteration of the vacuum? Sure, you don't have to believe that this is possible, but can anyone genuinely say they know absoluetly enough about the universe to say it isn't? How could you know it is not possible? If god existed, could he both known everything and know that he knows everything? How would he know that there was something that was outside of his knowledge except for mere arrogance? So unless any of you somehow known more that an otherwise omnisciently god is, then you don't really know if energy can be created or destroyed. All you have is observation and theory/philosophy/religion (whatever you want to call it) to inform you. We don't know how everything we know about works, and we have no ability to speak of that which is outside our knowledge. Some things are logically impossible (continual compression beyond random data), but creation/destruction of energy is not one of them. John On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:57 AM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: > In reply to H Ucar's message of Mon, 14 Mar 2016 12:34:25 +0200: > Hi Hamdi, > [snip] > >I did not expected that this issue would be totally ignored here. So > reciprocally, don't blame acedemic community for their own ignorances. > > My comment is that I think it's powered by a resonant connection with the > cyclotron radiation of the protons of the Van Allen belts. > IOW Tesla's "wheelwork of nature", but that implies a limited amount of > energy > available world wide. > > An alternative might be enhanced radioactive decay of long lived > radioisotopes > in the magnets, where the decay is triggered by changing magnetic fields, > as > magnets move relative to one another. > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >
