Daniel, I disagree with you. Arms-length distance can be obtained using an agreement. It is like the bank makes an appraisal of your home, when you are selling it. The whole idea is that it should be a third party. I can see that the payment creates a financial connection, which could sway the outcome. Therefore it is important that they have chosen a third party with good reputation. I think that is much of a third party you can ask for. Nobody will do the evaluation for free.
The whole debate about the credibility of the players involved is pathetic. We will know the outcome of the report within a few days. In any case I am sure that the report will not be so detailed as would be required from a scientific point of view. There are business reasons for creating the report and that is it. They want to help the value of IH shares and perhaps Leonardo's ditto. They want to open for the marketing of the product. I do believe the report is positive because they are business people. If the result showed no valuable (from business point) data, they would have cancelled the evaluation long time ago. Who wants to pay for an expensive consultant when you know that the result is useless? Unfortunately the publicized part of the report will leave many here disappointed as I doubt much 'evidence' of LENR will be given. It is another wait coming up for the marketing and sales of the product. Best Regards , Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass. (PJM) On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote: > So, the 3rd party was partially paid by Leonardo Corporation. If it were > paid by Industrial Heat only, I am not even sure if I'd give it a pass. >
