If IH and Leonardo Corp. paid a company/organization to send a salaried employee to do the test I would consider that more independent.
Harry On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> wrote: > Daniel, > I disagree with you. > Arms-length distance can be obtained using an agreement. > It is like the bank makes an appraisal of your home, when you are selling > it. > The whole idea is that it should be a third party. > I can see that the payment creates a financial connection, which could sway > the outcome. > Therefore it is important that they have chosen a third party with good > reputation. > I think that is much of a third party you can ask for. > Nobody will do the evaluation for free. > > The whole debate about the credibility of the players involved is pathetic. > We will know the outcome of the report within a few days. > In any case I am sure that the report will not be so detailed as would be > required from a scientific point of view. > There are business reasons for creating the report and that is it. > They want to help the value of IH shares and perhaps Leonardo's ditto. > They want to open for the marketing of the product. > > I do believe the report is positive because they are business people. > If the result showed no valuable (from business point) data, they would have > cancelled the evaluation long time ago. > Who wants to pay for an expensive consultant when you know that the result > is useless? > Unfortunately the publicized part of the report will leave many here > disappointed as I doubt much 'evidence' of LENR will be given. > It is another wait coming up for the marketing and sales of the product. > > > Best Regards , > Lennart Thornros > > > [email protected] > +1 916 436 1899 > > Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and > enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass. (PJM) > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> So, the 3rd party was partially paid by Leonardo Corporation. If it were >> paid by Industrial Heat only, I am not even sure if I'd give it a pass. > >
