Hi all If this letter is real then:
For any scientist to prejudge results as Ahern just apparently has, inevitably means bias. Given the nature of this open letter one must of course consider whether Ahern has had ulterior motives in approaching experimentalists and replicaters to offer his services. This is all a bit confusing as only a handful of days back Ahern sent materials to SKINR / University of Missouri group for the replication attempt on a Lugano type Rossi reactor. https://www.lenr-forum.com/.../2865-SKINR-University-of.../ If the Nickel reactors that Rossi invented, eg he has the Patent for them, do not work then what has Ahern be privately testing all this time? And why is he sending material he knows it will not work? I do hope that SKINR / University of Missouri group have sourced additional materials from another source than Ahern as I suggested; though I gave the reason at the time, of them not wanting to taint their experiment with some one who sceptics might argue as a source of "seasoned" fuel. Now I have to say I look at that offer by Ahern in a totally opposite light. No experimentalist should use the material from a person with a stated bias. Rossi has been completely open about the testing procedure and about the length of the test and when the results will be available, and kept to each of those promises. He told us he had a customer to buy the original reactor he had IH and Darden. Those who were sceptical were wrong. He told us there would be scientific test. The sceptical disbelieved again. Once again they were wrong and the Lugano report came out. Rossi said there would be a year long test in a factory. The sceptical said there was no factory. The sceptical were wrong the pictures showed it was a real industrial test. The sceptics said the test would be pushed to its bitter end. The sceptics were wrong; the test was completed just few days after its shortest possible period. The sceptics said their would be no report yet Rossi gave reasonable deadline for the publication of its abstract and a date for a conference in June. I think we all just need to patient and await the results like sensible human beings. Prejudging is not scientific. We will wait. Kind Regards walker On 31 March 2016 at 19:39, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > Dr. Brian Ahern is no skeptic of LENR. In fact he has verified > Arata/Zhang and reported anomalous thermal gain in several important > experiments. However, he sees Rossi as fraud, who is on the verge of > being abandoned by his backer, Industrial Heat – due to a dishonest report > which they cannot get behind. > > Here is Ahern’s open letter: > > “Constantly performing a bad behavior and expecting a different outcome > is the definition of insanity. > > The LENR community must recall that Andrea Rossi is a well-practiced > convict plying his trade. He has been claiming outputs one million-fold > higher than all other LENR efforts. Yet, after six years of such claims > there has never been an independent test. A big lie is easier to promote > than a small one. > > The Lugano test in 2014 was perhaps the best magic show of the 21st > century. Rossi convinced the Swedish scientists that thermocouples and > water flow calorimetry were unnecessary to verify his claims. Those > scientists are rightfully ashamed of themselves and have remained silent of > the report. They should confess to temporary insanity. Or as a minimum > they should offer an explanation for why the wasted the funds provided by > ELFORSK. > > I predicted that the ERV would be a problem. Rossi admitted paying for > this INDEPENDENT TEST. Yet he will not divulge: > > A. the ERV person > > B. His location > > C. His report > > D. The customer > > E. The E-Cat location > > F. Operational data > > Hoping that he has not fooled us again is a pathetic emotional response to > the great impresario. The hopeful LENR folks are enabling the bad > behavior. > > His suggestion of delaying the release until Stockholm is just another > delay tactic that he has employed artfully for the past six years.” > >