Jed, I think you are correct in who would be more qualified in one regard; experience and training is valuable if you want really objective scientific measures. However, in the real world it is a number of factors involved. We just do not have the full picture to evaluate what would have been a better solution taking all aspects into consideration. The real game here seems to be about money and investment capacity. It is of course possible that IH will come back with a rebuttal that claims the test was not professional and the result is not proven. Then your point will come to play. Personally I believe this will enhance the possibilities that LENR get the funding it deserves. The squeaky wheel story.
Best Regards , Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass. (PJM) On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:00 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com> wrote: > > about Penon "non independence", except having an italian name and having >> done a previous test, is there any relationship established with rossi >> predating the Ferrara test ? >> > > They have been working together for many years. > > It seems to me that an independent test should be conducted by someone you > have not worked with, who has not measured the performance of your previous > devices. Also, as I said, it should be someone fully qualified and licensed > to render a professional evaluation of an industrial-scale boiler in > Florida. $100 million is at stake! You cannot even get a license to operate > this kind of machine without approval from a certified, licensed engineer. > You sure would not pay $100 million without that level of proof. It would > be insane. > > - Jed > >
