It seems to me that the whole clash between IH and Rossi is not about patents or test results but about progress that Rossi has been making (and probably still is making) which is not clearly included in the agreements. The original agreement was made when Rossi was concentrating on the so-called 'hotcat' technology. In case the hotcat concept would work within the boundaries of the agreement IH would pay Rossi the remaining millions. This included the trade secrets to prepare the hotcat 'fuel' which is not described sufficiently in the patent applications. All this includes a working concept based on hotcat technology able to work with COP => 6.
Meanwhile Rossi has made significant progress in understanding how his hotcat process works and can be improved. He calls this the x-cat technology, the next generation e-cat technology. These insights and progression makes hotcat methods probably obsolete because of x-cat superiority. In my view the whole fight that emerged between IH and Rossi is not whether conditions have been met, but whether knowledge of the x-cat should be included or not. Rossi points out that the 'old' conditions in the agreement are still met (implemented with hotcat methods) and that IH therefore should fulfil the agreed payment. For IH this hotcat knowledge transfer is not profitable anymore now Rossi has his x-cat technology in his pocket. On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 5:51 AM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's your belief. If you are satisfied with it, then it's good. It > doesn't matter now. If what Rossi says is true, the technology will soon > spread. Otherwise, it's all a lie. > > 2016-04-09 22:56 GMT-03:00 Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>: > >> >> Defkalion never responded to Gamberale. They never disputed the report, >> or published a rebuttal. So I am confident Gamberale's version of events is >> accurate. >> >> - Jed >> >> >
