Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote: That's not true. > > 2016-04-09 13:05 GMT-03:00 Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>: > >> >> It went under because of the events described in the report. The report >> was published after Defkalion-Europe discovered the fraud, informed the >> customers, closed down and liquidated. That's what the report said. >> >
Okay, what do you think happened? What is the sequence of events? Do you think Gamberale's report is incorrect? If it is incorrect, where did you get the correct information from? Defkalion never responded to Gamberale. They never disputed the report, or published a rebuttal. So I am confident Gamberale's version of events is accurate. - Jed
